your animation requires more finesse. an expression of disgust is like ne explicitly expressed concept: consider the eloquence of wutever description may possibly limn your presentation, and you'll understand why your concepts r as clearly defined as the anatomy of the final human centipede in /clinical sodomy/, lol...
i coincide with earlier style is hurt by your inattention to detail. i wish for my critique to sound less than ridiculous, so please consider the possibility your animation techniques require greater fluidity and and physiological smoothness to their being if you wish to present a more convincingly realistic phantasmagorical grotesque.
as far as your sound is concerned, i'd generally think you should be more open-minded about it, but your /affection/ has positively affected me with its noir vocals and melodramatic sound walls. still, you emphasize a grunge impression which, although it successfully contemplates its existence in your piece of art, is being too unimaginative or conventional @minimum.
likewise, your style isn't constricted by your mentality. it's a decision i encourage you to rationalize with excessive doubt: imagine new, diverse realms of imagination and conceptualize new, diverse mentality accordingly. if you wish to dive deeper in that which interests you, i support your passion; however, if you wish to do so without looking back and appreciating the endless scenery growing all around you, i cannot accept your absence of acceptance for me. furthermore, it's a valueless promise to accept new, diverse perspectives and not act upon their influence over is to disrespect them and ignore their value.
neway, i cannot obligate you or change your mind. if you wish to be open-minded, your introspective acknowledgment of said notion will present itself in your outward expressions (e.g. your pieces of art).
also, emily youcis... lol... was there a distorted alfred easter egg newhere? :<